July 20, 2007

  • Creation & Fine Wine: Part 3 – Some Final Things

    I was going to end this subject with Part 2 but with the urging from
    Bee who said I should do a little bit more on the “other things” found
    in John 2, I’ve decided that I would do that.

    We were able to note that Jesus was only in His third day of public
    ministry, the first day was with John the Baptist where Jesus was
    baptized. The second day was gathering some of his disciples. The five
    that came with him were Andrew, Simon Peter, Philip, and Nathaniel. So
    Jesus went with them to Cana of Galilee on the third day (His first day in public ministry) and Jesus’
    mother was there and both Jesus’ and His disciples were invited to the
    wedding that was to take place.  When the wine ran out, Jesus’ mother
    said to Him that they have no wine. And Jesus answers her, “Woman, what
    does that have to do with us? My hour has not yet come.”

    Have you ever wondered why Jesus’ answered that way? It seems odd that
    He would just out of the blue say something like that without a
    reason.  I have heard several different explanations over the years but
    none of them sounded quite right. It wasn’t until reading  later in the
    account we find that the headwaiter asks the bridegroom about why he
    chose to serve the best wine last, and then the answer began to dawn on
    me.  It wasn’t Jesus’ time to order the wine for a wedding. You see it
    is clear that in that culture it was the bridegroom who made the
    selections and arrangements for the wine.  When His mother asks Him
    about this, He is rightfully responding… “Its not my wedding. The time
    for that has not come.”  Given this, it appears that Jesus is referring
    to the marriage supper of the Lamb that is referred to in Ephesians
    5:22-33 where the church is referred to as the bride of Christ and in
    Revelation 19:7-10 where the marriage actually occurs. So we have an
    actual reference to this future event right at the beginning of Jesus’
    ministry.

    The matter of the stone waterpots, their number being six which was
    made reference to in the last post, were interesting. These were set
    there for the Jewish custom of purification. Being that the whole affair of the wine was important enough to have us
    understand its significance with creation based on the nature of the
    wine and it was at the beginning of Jesus’ ministry, perhaps the pots
    were for the purification of a people for His namesake and this may be the entire reason for the creation as it is. Consider that the Bride of Christ mentioned above will be washed by the
    water of His word (Ephesians 5:26). She will be cleansed from sin by His shed blood on the Cross symbolized by the wine as the blood of the covenant which is poured
    out for many for the forgiveness of sins. It would show us that they
    would be purified from their sin. This would be signified by His being
    raised in miraculous power on the third day after His death and with
    the miracle of the changing of the water into wine happening on the third day of His ministry. Since
    the capacity of all the waterpots was more than enough for all the
    participants in most any wedding, the 120 to 180 gallons of wine would
    indicate that the wine (blood) would be more than enough for all at the
    wedding and then some and that the salvation through Christ would be
    just as overly abundant.

    Even the serving of the wine, the lesser quality wine being served
    before the best wine that came from Jesus’ miracle has significance.
    This life has no comparison to the life that follows this one and
    certainly when Christ reigns and the new heavens and new earth are here
    and the old things are passed away (physically) there will no
    comparison to the wonderful quality of the life that is to come. 

    There is so much here it makes me want to stop and just ponder at the
    power of His word and the value of every word that He has given us
    concerning His love for us. I am simply in awe and there’s little more to say.  Mr.Vee

Comments (6)

  • I love the posts you've done on this. Sorry for distracting you from your normal course of discourse... no, I'm not. I'm really glad you did these. Thank you. You've revealed a lot to me in this.

  • Hi, FKIProfessor... Thanks for your encouragement. I want to thank you for having the subject brought up on your blog. I had never actually heard this rendition of John 2 before yet as I was meditating the questions you were asking everyone about "creation". I was burdened by the fact of all the argument about evolution and creation over many years and it seemed to be going nowhere and all the scientific and technical jargon was losing so many who could not follow it. In frustration, I simply prayed that the Lord could show me a simple answer for the whole matter of creation so I could "get on with life" and have a reasonable answer that would not be complicated for those who would ask. After a day or two, I ended up finding this passage while I was looking for a reference to Jacob's ladder for the Discovering God's Character series in at the end of John 1 and the whole passage in John 2 "opened up" before my eyes. I was amazed I had never seen this before. The result is what I have shared with you in the three posts. The Lord is good. Mr.Vee

  • I liked the post, could the 6 pots represent 6000 years, one pot for each 1000 years?

  • Hi, Eddieray... Thanks! It could be yet I don't really know. I did not get any insight on that. The rest of it was so closely and symbolically linked to the creation that it feels a bit stretched to make it say that but I wouldn't discount it. Its possible. Let's put it this way, it would be really interesting if it was. Mr.Vee

  • Thanks Mr. Vee!

  • Hi VV, I have run across computer programmers who only believe something is an error if you can show a test.  They have no understanding that you can know that something is an error based on a priori principle.  People today have no understanding of principles or how they may be used.  It's the obverse of your post on my site, where people applied pure science models and expect to get exact theoretical results.  The magnetic force/distance relationship is a good waker-upper.  I have read that when tested on a force gauge, magnetic force varies inversely with distance to the 2.6-2.7 power -- not cubed as the theory states.

Comments are closed.

Post a Comment